Wednesday, February 8, 2012

Ceritera Perempuan Yahudi dan Negara Israel

"Unorthodox:" A Woman's Journey from Repression to Freedom

By Sarah B. Weir, Yahoo! blogger


Deborah FeldmanGrowing up, Deborah Feldman had to wear skirts that covered her ankles and high-necked blouses made of woven fabric so they wouldn't cling to her body. She wasn't allowed to read books in English because her grandfather, with whom she lived, said they were written in an "impure language." When she was twelve, she suffered a sexual assault, which she kept hidden because she had been taught that men's lust was ungovernable. This was supposedly the reason her world was segregated by gender.


At 17, Feldman's grandparents pushed her into an arranged marriage with a virtual stranger, but she had never even heard the word "sex" spoken or learned about the very basics of human reproduction. Once married, she was expected to shave her head and wear a wig—something she rebelled against after a year because she found it so depressing. Seven years later, despite the fact she knew she would be hated as a pariah, she abandoned her community and started life over.

You might be surprised that Feldman didn't grow up in a far away country with repressive laws against women, but in an ultra-conservative Jewish enclave in New York City. "They've passed more laws from out of nowhere, limiting women—there's a rule that women can't be on the street after a certain hour," Feldman told the New York Post describing the Hasidic Satmar community in which she was raised. "We all hear these stories about Muslim extremists; how is this any better? This is just another example of extreme fundamentalism."

Feldman explained the roots of Satmar Hasidism to the Daily Mail. She describes a Jewish sect that has largely turned its back on the modern word, which she says is, "a reaction to the atrocities of Holocaust." Most of the members are descendants of Holocaust survivors who fled from Hungary and Romania during the Second World War. She continues, "Hasidic Jews in America eagerly returned to a heritage that had been on the verge of disappearing, donning traditional dress and speaking only in Yiddish, as their ancestors had done." The community emphasizes family life and reproduction in order to, as Feldman puts it, "replace the many who had perished and to swell their ranks once more. To this day, Hasidic communities continue to grow rapidly, in what is seen as the ultimate revenge against Hitler."

Deborah chronicles her journey from her repressive childhood inundefined a t."

ight-knit section of Williamsburg, Brooklyn to finding the courage as a young woman to leave it all behind in her upcoming memoir, "Unorthodox: The Scandalous Rejection of My Hasidic Roots


In her book, Feldman describes a community that had become so oppressive and insular that paradoxically, it put its children at risk. "There was this old man on my street who, every day on my way to school, would be sitting on this bench, and would call out to me and offer me candy," Feldman told the Post. "I told my grandfather, and he said, 'Well, he's older than you, so you have to talk to him out of respect.' The guy was, like, a pedophile," Feldman continues. "And we were taught to respect him." As a kid, she was told all outsiders hated her, and that if she spoke to anyone non-Hasidic, she "risked getting kidnapped and chopped to pieces."

It was concern for her own young son that ultimately pushed her to escape. She writes about a "lackadaisical" attitude toward health and safety fueled by the idea that "God will protect you." One night, speeding down the highway on thin tires she got into an accident and her car flipped three times. She says that no one ever made kids wear seat belts. She realized that her son would have been killed if he had been with her. She had been asking her husband to change the tires for months and when he met her at the hospital, she announced that she was leaving.

Feldman was enrolled part-time at Sarah Lawrence College and a classmate took her in. In fact, in one of her history classes, while studying the art of the memoir, a seed was planted that "one person can make history." From that moment she thought, "I might be able to make a mark or have my voice heard."

She says she is an outcast now and that her family sends her hate mail. "They want me to commit suicide," she told the Post. Her husband has been pushed to the fringes of the group. Feldman says he's less religious now and has trimmed his beard short and wears jeans. They share custody of their five-year-old son.

Although she made the break with her community two years ago, Feldman says she's still "very careful" and hides her address. She calls her book a kind of insurance policy against being harmed by her relatives because "they are terrified of their having their actions become public." Nevertheless, Feldman herself is moving toward forgiveness. In "Unorthodox," she writes of her grandmother, "I'd like to hold her responsible for everything I went through…but I am too wise for that. I know the way of our world, and the way people get swept along in the powerful current of our age-old traditions."

Copyright © 2012 Yahoo Inc

Catitan Sut:

Di tengah-tengah bandaraya New York, pegangan dan amalan kelompok Yahudi Hasidic rupanya masih berbaki. Agak hebat untuk kekal sedemikian dalam suasana bandaraya yang sebesar itu, jauh dari suasana perkampongan yang didiami oleh kelompok Amish, atau suasana yang agak terpencil bagi kelompok pengamal polygamy Mormon.

Saya rasa kerdil diri apabila membaca kisah ini, bagaimana mereka walaupun bukan berada di atas kebenaran aqidah dan syari'ah, tetapi begitu teguh berpegang kepada fahaman dan amalan agama mereka; sedangkan kita yang dianugerahi Allah dengan sebesar-besar nikmat, yakni nikmat iman dan Islam tetapi begitu lemah untuk berdiri teguh berpegang kepada anjuran-anjuran agama kita, sedangkan kita berada dalam masyarakat yang majoritinya beragama Islam, bukannya di New York!

Saya juga teringat satu temubual bersama penulis tersohor Anthony Burgess dalam tahun awal 80'an yang menyebut tentang sejarah awal perkembangan agama-agama Samawi: yahudi, kristian dan Islam. Yahudi adalah agama bagi satu bangsa, di zaman Saiyyidina Musa alaihi salam , ianya bermula dengan ummah yang tertindas, yang keluar dari wilayah penindasan dan kemudiannya merayau di gurun Sinai untuk sekelian lama. Suasana awalnya bukan suasana urban yang multi-cultural. Begitu juga dengan kristian, Saiyyidina Isa 'alaihi salam adalah seorang rasul yang zuhud, bahkan tiada mempunyai rumah kediaman yang tetap dan mengembara di wilayah yang mempunyai ruang luas terbuka. Ianya juga tidak berlatar belakangkan urban setting. Rasulullah Sollallahu 'alaihi salam adalah penduduk Makkah, sebuah bandar yang didatangi oleh masyarakat dekat dan jauh untuk menunaikan ibadat di sekeliling Kaabah, serta penduduk Makkah sebahagiannya pedagang yang berkafilah ke Yaman , Syam serta lainnya. Kemudian baginda berhijrah ke Madinah, yang juga bandar yang didiami oleh bukan sahaja orang arab bahkan orang Yahudi serta tidak pula terpisah daripada kelompok kristian di Najran . Islam bermula sebagai agama yang berkembang di dlam suasana urban-setting yang memiliki kebelbagaian ragam. Bagi Anthony Burgess , sejarah awal ini menyebabkan Islam mempunyai kelebihan berbanding dengan agama yang lain untuk berkembang dan menyesuai di benua Eropah yang telah menjadi penempatan yang sifatnya urban.

Begitu juga yang terbayang dalam tulisan Karen Armstrong dalam bukunya The Holy War, dia menyatakan dalam ketiga agama ini, hanyalah penganjur agama Islam yang terlibat secara langsung dengan peperangan, menyebabkan Islam mempunyai feqah tentang perang, apa yang boleh dilakukan dan apa yang dilarang. Dalam ajaran kristian dan yahudi mereka tidak mempunyai bab khusus tentang hukum dan adab peperangan, dalam kristian semangat asalnya ialah "jika lawanmu menampar pipi kananmu, berilah pula pipi kirimu", sementara dalam ajaran Yahudi "ianya lebih baik membunuh diri dalam berpegang kepada agama , sebagai suatu bentuk penyesalan dan taubat, daripada tewas di tangan lawan".

Menarik juga untuk melihat pengamatan Arnold Toynbee dalam bukunya Civilization On Trial yang menbandingkan pergerakan sebahagian ummah ini yang muncul dan bergerak dengan setting yang terpisah dari arus utama masyarakat dan gerakan yang muncul di tengah-tengah arus utama masyarakat. Beliau memberi contoh Gerakan Sanusiyyah dan Gerakan Wahabi sebagai mewakili gerakan yang terpisah dan terasing, sementara gerakan modernist Muhammad Ali Pasha dan gerakan secularist Kamal Atarturk sebagai gerakan yang muncull di tengah-tengah bandar dan begitu accomodative dengan nilai-nilai luar, bahkan sentiasa mahu menjejaki dari belakang kemajuan kebendaan negara-negara maju.

Agaknya ada manafaatnya kita sentuh isu yahudi serta Negara Israel. Tidak semua golongan pengikut Yahudi menyokong penubuhan Israel, Israel ditubuhkan oleh golongan Nasionalis Zionist yang berfahaman secular, ianya bukan untuk menegakkan negara agama. Pengikut yahudi dituntut berdoa dan menaruh harap yang tinggi agar Messiah segera diturunkan Tuhan, dia lah yang akan memimpin the lost tribes of jews untuk kembali ke Tanah Suci, kemunculan Messaih yang ditunggu-tunggu oleh mereka itu dipercayai mereka bergantung kepada amalan dan taubat anak cucu Israel, mereka telah terbuang ke sana-sini selama ini disebabkan oleh pendurhakaan kepada Tuhan.

Bagaimana sebahagian orang kristian memang mengharapkan agar terbentuk negara Israel, kerana mereka percaya yang Jesus akan datang 'the second Coming' itu berlaku di Temple of Solomon (Haikal as-Sulayman); mereka mengharapkan kumpulan Zionist yang berkuasa di Tanah Suci itu akan membina semula Temple Of Solomon, sebagaimana persediaan tempat turunnya Jesus nanti. Oleh itu tiada hairanlah kelompok Kristian beriya-iya menyokong penubuhan Negara Israel, selain daripada untuk mengkucar-kacirkan politik rantau itu. Ketidak-stabilan politik dan keselamatan rantau itu adalah aset bagi kepentingan mereka.

Bagi kita , ummah Islam, kita melihat kebenaran perkataan Rasulullah Sollallahu 'alaihi wasallam, semenjak zaman sebelum Nabi kita dilahirkan lagi, rantau itu telah dikuasai oleh golongan Kristian, atau Rum Timur. Orang Yahudi tiada mempunyai tempat di Palestine sehingga tentera Islam menguasai wilayah tersebut, kemudiannya orang yahudi sekali lagi terusir dari wilayah tersebut apabila tentera crusaders menguasai wilayah tersebut. Mereka mendatangi wilayah ini secara berduyun-duyun semenjak Perang Dunia Kedua, kerana peristiwa yang penuh misteri, Holocaust dan kemudiannya penubuhan Negara Israel. Rasulullah menyebut yang tentera ummah ini akan berperang di akhir zaman dengan tentera yahudi di wilayah tersebut, sedangkan ketika baginda menuturkan perkara ini kaum Yahudi hampir tiada yang berbaki di wilayah tersebut, maklumlah penganut Kristian memang sangat memusuhi orang Yahudi kerana bagi mereka orang Yahudilah yang menyalib Jesus secara zalim.

Kewuiudan negara Israel adalah suatu realiti politik semasa, menidakkan kewujudannya adalah menidakkan suatu realiti. Saya masih teringat pada akhir tahun 80'an, seorang tua yang saya hormati, Ustaz Hasan Doah, seorang penulis dan veteran sukarelawan Ikhwan al-Muslimin yang berperang melawan tentera Yahudi , pasukannya juga pernah disertai oleh Yasser Arafat yang ketika itu masih muda remaja; memberitahu saya yang Yasser Arafat baru asahaja datang menziarahi beliau dan menjelaskan tentang penubuhan Pihak Berkuasa Palestine bagi mentadbir Gaza dan Tebing Barat. Walaupun commitment dan fahaman kedua tokoh ini ketika itu sudah banyak berbeza, tetapi Pak Cik Hassan Doah bersetuju dan menyokong gagasan tersebut. Bagi beliau ini bukan bermakna rakyat Palestine mengalah dan berpada dengan dengan tawaran tersebut atau seakan mengiktiraf keabsahan Kerajaan Israel; tetapi ianya adalah sautu langkah permulaan bagi langkah-langkah seterusnya. Ambillah dahulu apa yang dapat sementara bersedia untuk yang selebihnya. bagi beliau ianya kurang cerdik sekiranya kita hanya menghadkan kepada dua pilihan; yakni semada meniadakan langsung entiti Israel dari peta Asia Barat atau biarkan dan abaikan sahaja segala usaha selain pilihan pertama.

Pak Cik yang baik hati ini telahpun meninggal dunia, beliau pernah telah dipenjara selama 9 tahun dan termasuk hukuman kerja berat kerana penglibatan beliau di dalam Ikhwan al-Muslimin, beliau ditangkap ketika beliau baharu sahaja mendirikan rumah-tangga, Sebelum itu beliau adalah pemimpin pelajar universiti yang sangat fasih berceramah, ketika itu beliau rapat dengan Ustaz Said Ramadan, menantunya Imam Hasan al-Banna dan juga Ustaz kamal Sharif, yang kemudiannya menjadi menteri di Jordan. Saya kerap menziarahi beliau ketika beliau di hari-hari tuanya menjadi pengurus Hotel Aman di Dokki, Kaherah. Semoga Allah merahmati Pak Cik yang baik hati ini.

Thursday, February 2, 2012

Kekuatan Negara Hutang Dan Masaalah Hutang Negara

Biggest Holders of US Government Debt

As the U.S. government spends an unprecedented amount of money to fix the economy, there is an equally great need to raise the cash to pay for it. This is accomplished through borrowing, whereby Uncle Sam sells Treasury securities of varying maturity.

For investors, government bills, notes and bonds are considered safe because they have a guaranteed rate of return, based on faith in future U.S. tax revenues. The government has been partially funding operations via Treasury securities for decades.

This borrowing adds to the national debt, which has recently surpassed $15 trillion and is rising every second. The amount of debt is quickly approaching the federal debt ceiling, a legal limit to borrowing that currently stands at $16.4 trillion.

Much of that debt is held by private sector, but about 40 percent is held by public entities, including parts of the government. Here's who owns the most. Foreign countries listed include private and public investors, according to monthly U.S. Treasury data.

1. Federal Reserve and Intragovernmental Holdings

U.S. debt holdings: $6.328 trillion

That’s right, the biggest single holder of U.S. government debt is inside the United States and includes the Federal Reserve system and other intragovernmental holdings. Of this number, The Fed's system of banks owns approximately $1.65 billion in U.S. Treasury securities (as of January 2012), while other U.S. intragovernmental holdings - which include large funds such as the Medicare Trust Fund and the Social Security Trust Fund - hold the rest.

In the monthly Treasury bulletin, both are combined into one category and the total accounts for a stunning $6.328 trillion in holdings as of September 2011 (the most recent number available). The amount is an all-time high as the Federal Reserve continues to expand its balance sheet, partially to purchase U.S. government debt securities. The Social Security Trust fund is required by law to invest in securities where the principal and interest is guaranteed by the Federal government.

About a decade ago, the total government holdings were "only" $2.5 trillion.

2. China



U.S. debt holdings: $1.132 trillion

The largest foreign holder of U.S. Treasury securities, China currently has $1.132 trillion in American debt, although it is down from all time highs of $1.173 trillion in July 2011. For more on China and currency, see CNBC Explains.



3. Other Investors/Savings Bonds

U.S. debt holdings $1.107 trillion

With the most recent numbers from June 2011, this extremely diverse group includes individuals, government-sponsored enterprises, brokers and dealers, bank personal trusts, estates, savings bonds, corporate and noncorporate businesses for a total of $1.107 trillion.

Although the level of debt held in U.S. savings bonds has remained basically constant since 2000, the broad category of "other" investors has nearly quadrupled since reaching a four-year low in December 2007.


4. Japan



U.S. debt holdings: $1.038 trillion

One of the U.S.'s largest trade partners, Japan is also one of the U.S.'s largest debt holders, currently owning $1.038 trillion in Treasury securities.




5. Pension Funds


U.S. debt holdings: $842.2 billion

Pension funds control large amounts of money, reserved for personal retirements, and thus are obligated to make relatively safe investments. This group, which includes private and local government pension funds, holds $842.2 billion in U.S. debt. The private pension fund category also includes U.S. Treasury securities held by the Federal Employees Retirement System Thrift Savings Plan G Fund.

6. Mutual Funds



U.S. debt holdings: $653.5 billion

According to the Federal Reserve, mutual funds hold the sixth-largest amount of U.S. debt compared to any other group, although mutual fund holdings have diminished by more than $105 billion since December 2008. Including money market funds, mutual funds and closed-end funds, this group of investments managed about $653.5 billion in U.S. Treasury securities as of June 2011, which are the most recent numbers available.

7. State and Local Governments

U.S. debt holdings: $484.4 billion

U.S. state and local governments have nearly a half-trillion dollars invested in American debt, according to the Federal Reserve. The level of investment has remained stable since 2006, moving within the range of $484 billion and $576 billion. The current debt holdings, however, represent the lowest aggregate level for state and local governments since December 2005, when they stood at $481.4 billion.



8. The United Kingdom



U.S. debt holdings: $429.4 billion

The U.K. currently holds $429.4 billion in U.S. debt, but the country's investment has fluctuated dramatically during the past two years. Now at its all-time high (and rapidly increasing), British holdings were as low as $55 billion in June 2008.




9. Depository Institutions

U.S. debt holdings: $284.5 billion

As of June 2011 (the most recent numbers available), the Federal Reserve Board of Governors lists depository institutions as holding about $284.5 billion in U.S. debt.

This group includes commercial banks, savings banks and credit unions. In 2011, its holdings more than tripled from the 2008 low of $105 billion. Between June and September 2011, holdings for depository institutions fell by nearly $44 billion.

10. Insurance Companies



U.S. debt holdings: $250.1 billion

According to the Federal Reserve Board of Governors, insurance companies hold $250.1 billion in Treasury securities. This group includes property-casualty and life insurance firms.

Catitan Sut

Pelek juga sebuah negara yang begitu dihormati kerana nilai-nilai yang didukungnya, bahkan ditakuti kerana kekuatan ketenteraannya serta dicontohi kerana kemajuan sains dan technology nya mempunyai begitu banyak hutang.

Peleknya juga selain daripada hutang dalam negara, negara luar terbesar memberi hutang kepada Amerika adalah China. China tidak dikagumi oleh i masyarakat dunia ketiga sebagaimana mereka mengkagumi Amerika.

Sekarang ini sudah terdapat suatu trend di Amerika sendiri untuk mempersoalkan apakah sistem ekonomi capitalism itu adalah perkara sama dengan sistem politik demokrasi?. Apakah kebugaran Wall Sreet itu perlu diutamakan melebihi kebajikan rakyat jelata- sehingga berbillin-billion dollar perlu dicurahkan di situ untuk menyelamatkan beberapa syarikat gergasi yang tenat? Apakah dasar luar negara juga ditentu-arah oleh kehendak-kehendak pedagang-pedagang ini?.

Di negara kita pula, pemimpin utama berucap megah mengisytiharkan yang negara kita tidak perlu berhutang kepada pihak luar, tidak IMF dan tidak kepada World Bank; sekiranya secara jujur kita bertanya adalah hutang negara kita bertambah atau berkurang?. Berapa peratuskah Belanjawan kita digunakan untuk sekadar membayar bunga serta pokok hutang negara, bukan untuk pengurusan atau pembangunan?. Tidakkah sudah sampai masanya untuk kita dengan rendah diri mengaku dan tidak berselindung yang hutang negara kita semakin menjadi parah? Atau kita akan terus berbangga dengan memaklumkan kita akan terus gagah walaupun bebanan hutang semakin meningkat, lihat sahajalah Amerika, negara yang terkuat di dunia pun banyak hutangnya, itulah sebenarnya ciri-ciri negara yang kuat. Mungkin menjelang 2020 hutang kita semakin banyak dan kita semakin kuat, sekuat Amerika .. paling kurang dari segi kuat berhutang.

Rasulullah Sollallu 'alaihi wasallam mengajar kita agar berdoa minta berlindung dengan Allah dari dikalahkan oleh hutang dan dari digagahi oleh kekuatan lelaki yang lainnya......

Wednesday, January 11, 2012

POLITICS & BULLETS: SYRIAN TRAGEDIES & AK PARTY IMPACT














Bashar Assad, who took over the Presidency of Syria following the death of his father Hafez Assad, excited both the Syrian people and the foreign public opinion. The Cold War years passed. The USSR, which was the biggest partner of Syria, was gone and Bashar Assad was facing new world order. As the history in the Middle East changes with the Arab Spring; it seems that Assad, who failed to satisfy the Syrian people in the past 12 years and who was late in making political reforms, will strive to survive by creating polarization over himself and by protecting regional balances, just like during the Cold War period in the Middle East. Assad, who keeps the whole military, security and intelligence power of the country under his own monopoly, aims at easing the tension inside by settling the opposition by February. Regarding the relations with Turkey; Assad, who aims at stopping the AK Party government not from outside but from inside, wants to be at least supported by the Turkish public opinion by inviting Turkish opposition parties to Damascus. And Assad's relations with Turkey are shaped by the advisors with Nationalist identities in the Turkish public opinion.

Target of Damascus Administration: Turkish Public Opinion

The Damascus administration wants to take the support of the Turkish public opinion in order to continue its legitimacy. This is the reason lying behind the fact that they wanted to invite the Felicity Party (SP) in Damascus. Workers' Party (İP) and Republican People's Party (CHP) had already been hosted. Making its move upon the visit of CHP, Damascus administration invited Felicity Party, which is on the conservative side, to the country. It appeared that Damascus administration pursued two goals in the visit of Felicity Party. One of these goals is to give message to conservative circles supporting the Felicity in Turkey, and to receive support in Turkey and Middle East by taking advantage of the deceased Necmettin Erbakan factor. Knowing what Erbakan means to Felicity, the Assad administration also took into account that Erdoğan did politics besides Erbakan. And secondly, as Ikhwanists were among insurgents, the regime is striving to show the support from parties such as Felicity. Following the visit of SP, MHP and BDP invitations come next. The Damascus administration will firstly invite MHP, and if this visit takes place, then BDP will be invited. The objective is to raise the voice of Turkish opposition against Erdoğan government. And to stop Erdoğan, who strongly opposes to Syria, not from outside but from inside. As for the visit of MHP, they want to receive the support of both nationalist circles and another opposition party besides CHP within the Assembly.

Nationalist Turkish Advisor of Assad

People, who are known for their nationalist identities in the Turkish public opinion, lead the relations between Turkey and Bashar Assad that is rapidly dragged into both problematic and rough period of relations with Turkey. In other words, Assad looks Turkey from the point of view of Nationalist authorities and the authorities from Workers' Party. As a matter of fact, the strategy of desiring to stop AK Party government not from outside but from inside also stems from this fact. Within this framework, the Assad Regime invites all the political party leaders to Damascus, in order to stop the AK Party government, which follows a strong policy against Syria, not from outside but from inside.

When a group of irresponsible spoilers, who were mad at the sanction decision of the Arab League in Syria, attacked our consulate buildings, burned Turkish flag and Atatürk posters; Assad's Nationalist Turkish Advisor warns. According to this advisor, the circles that are sensitive on the issues such as Turkish flag and Mustafa Kemal in Turkey, and the circles that are the “most sensitive” and “acting most responsibly” towards the events taking place in Syria are the same people. These people state that this kind of actions are not right, by indicating they are in solidarity with Syria and they are against imperialist policies. Accordingly, the policy they imposed on Assad seems like convincing the opposition against Prime Minister Erdoğan.

Assad Paves The Way For Kurdish Autonomous Region

Bashar Assad launched reforms on the Kurdish, who have been living in Syria and who has not even had identities for many years. As of the beginning of last month, Assad gave the Kurdish green light to have their identities. However, Assad's solution policy on the Kurdish problem proceeds on a disturbing basis for the neighbors and the U.S.

Upon the fact that Iraqi Kurdish Regional Government President Massoud Barzani, who was invited to Damascus by Assad, did not accept this invitation; and the fact that Barzani held meetings with the Lebanese Hariri family, he started to make reforms on the Kurdish within his own country. Assad considers the Iraqi Kurdish Regional Government as a region under the auspices of the U.S. and Turkey. Therefore, in return for the Barzani card, Assad talked to Democratic Union Party (PYD), which is the political extension of PKK in Syria. He has made gestures to PYD, not expected from him, for the last three months.

Going back to several months of Assad-PYD relations, the moment the leader of PYD Saleh Muslim, who was sentenced to life in prison, while in exile, by PYD and forgiven by Assad, was released; he showed up in the meeting that was organized by the Ba'ath Party and told the people to support the Assad Regime by explaining it. In accordance with the Assad-PKK agreement, Muslim was suddenly released when he had been sentenced to life in prison. According to the Syrian laws, life sentence is practices in two ways; one is for lifetime, and the other is in case of showing goodwill (goodwill is possible only after completing 21 years of sentence). Thus, Saleh Muslim had to be in the jail at least for 21 years.

Depending on the Syrian policy of Turkey and the U.S., it is suggested that Assad's card on Barzani and the Kurdish would be the establishment of a Kurdish autonomous region under the control of PYD.

Felicity Party's (SP) Visit

The Felicity Party's visit means a lot for the Syrian regime. As the regime knows the conservative nature of the Felicity Party, they strove a lot to explain especially to the delegation that what took place in Syria was not a sectarian conflict, and that Sunnis were not massacred. And the Damascus regime shows the U.S. and Israel as the address to bloody events taking place in the country. The objective is to convince a party with a certain political stance such as Felicity Party on this subject. The moment the Damascus regime convinces on this issue, the regime designs to contribute to the legitimacy of its future acts across the country. The Felicity Party's holding top-level meetings partially depends on it. The regime is considering every possible method in order not to lose the legitimate ground. And the regime wants to take advantage of the influence of Necmettin Erbakan factor on Turkey and the region; despite the fact that the party received limited amount of votes in the last elections.

Bahçeli Expected To Damascus

The following target of the Damascus regime, which wants to evaluate Erbakan factor, is nationalist circles in Turkey. The Assad administration wants to turn the fact that Devlet Bahçeli, leader of the MHP, brought forward the question of “Is there any Turkish officers in custody in Syria?”, into an opportunity. Saying that “We have the answer of Bahçeli's question and we would like to welcome him here; if he comes, then he finds the answer of his questions,” the Assad regime wants to kill two birds with one stone. After they partially draw the attention of conservative circles in Turkey away from the Felicity Party, now they will strive to explain themselves to nationalist circles through MHP. They want to win MHP, which is an effective opposition party in Assembly, over like they won over CHP. Thus, the Damascus regime wants to narrow the circle around Prime Minister Erdoğan they set goal themselves, and the regime also wants to maintain their own legitimacy they established on shedding blood. Bahçeli's going to Damascus is one of the most important agenda topics in the country, right now.

Attitude of Assad Regime

Assad regime considerably tries not to take the Turkish public opinion against, in relations with Turkey. As if everyone agreed, the regime tries to reflect the problem between Turkey and Syria like, “We do not have problem with the Turkish people, Prime Minister Erdoğan does not want to understand us,” as the problem of the Turkish government. As a matter of fact, Assad regime tries to show the attitude that Turkey adopted against the Assad regime, by facing the opposition of AK Party government. The whole propaganda of the Damascus regime is placed on the axis of “We have no problem with the Turkish people, Erdoğan does not understand us”.

Syrian Media And Religious Authorities

The Syrian media reflects the position of Damascus Regime the best. The Syrian regime makes the regime propaganda through the media and religious authorities. On visual and written media, frequently the emphasis is stressed on “Turkey is our brother, but its management methods are wrong”. The man in the street is partially convinced to this as well. Considering the sympathy of the Syrian towards Erdoğan and Turkey by stating that “Erdoğan did the right thing in two cases, but now he has a wrong political stance”, referring to the Prime Minister Erdoğan's attitude in Davos and about Mavi Marmara, the propaganda of the Assad regime is pumped through media. As for the Syrian religious authorities: Even during the friday sermon in the Umayyad Mosque, which is one of the most important mosques of Damascus and the Middle East, the Assad regime is defended. Imam, who is informed in advance by the regime, mentions a similar broadcast with the one on the media by knowing Turks are in the mosque during the sermon; “The Turkish are our brothers and sisters. The U.S. and Israel want to create trouble in Syria in order to split Muslims. We should act together in order not be like Iraq and Libya.” However, the conversation meetings, which are carried out after the prayer in Umayyad Mosque, are not the same as before. While the popular religious authorities of the region used to form conversation circles, it is not quite possible to see those circled today.

Current Situation in Damascus

After the events broke out, Damascus has been longing for its old days. In Damascus, which is one of the headquarters of the Middle East, life stops especially as of the evening hours. Even during the shopping tours of the delegation under the supervision of the Syrian administration, the pressure on the people is felt. Although the Assad administration give speech in Damascus, the life in Damascus tells the opposite. As of 6 pm, the life in the capital comes to a standstill. The restaurants have no customers. Even in the restaurants, where the administration brings the delegation to, almost no one else is found other than the delegation. Besides, the number of people with uniforms has increased 4-5 times in Damascus, compared to usual times. It is possible to see soldier or police officer on every corner.

Current Situation in Homs

The current situation in Homs, which is one of the centers that the insurrection fire was started against the Assad regime, is the fact that the regime keeps many things under control. Although it is far away from Damascus, all the official spokesmen of Homs speak in line with the Damascus regime, in all their statements. The Homs Governor Ghassan Abdel Al, who welcomed the journalists, mentions that the events taking place in Syria is caused by foreign powers, with exactly the same statement as in Damascus.

Administrative Body of The Felicity Party in Damascus

The administrative body of the Felicity Party, who went to Damascus upon the invitation of the Assad regime in Syria, has been carrying on their talks for three days. Journalists take place among the group of 20 people. The party delegation, under the leadership of the Chairman of the Felicity Party Mustafa Kamalak, was welcomes quite warmly by the Damascus administration. For three days, people from the Felicity Party were given the message that the people in the country was not massacred by the regime. During the talks, the idea that Syria was on the verge of a civil war and that Turkey should not be a part of it gained importance among the Felicity Party delegation. The events taking place in Syria were considered as not to be a “sectarian conflict”, but to be the U.S. and Israeli trick. The delegation could not find opportunity to talk to the Ikhwan group, which revolted against the Syrian regime. It was indicated that the delegation would turn back to Turkey after talking to Bashar Assad, and then, that they would prepare a “Syrian Report” related to the talks.

Talked To Whom

Kamalak's visit to Syria started with a busy traffic of talks. The visit that Leader of the Felicity Party Mustafa Kamalak and his delegation paid to Syria in a critical process started with a busy traffic of talks. In the morning, Kamalak firstly talked to Musafa Ahmet al-Dabi, the Head of the Arab League Observer Mission. Afterwards, he met with Prof. Najah al-Attar, Vice President of Syria. And then, he talked to the Syrian Minister of Information Adnan Mahmoud, Syrian Foreign Minister Walid al-Muallem, and Syria's Mufti Ahmed Hassan.

Assad: We Live In The Same House, Fire Affects All The Rooms, We Should Extinguish It Together

The Syrian Head of State Bashar Assad, who talked to the Leader of the Felicity Party Mustafa Kamalak, said that “We are brothers and sisters, and we live in the same house. When fire breaks out in different rooms of the house, the other rooms are also negatively affected.” Drawing attention to the fact that Turkey's being influenced by Qatar's policies would result in problems in terms of the balances in the Middle East, Assad said that, “Turkey is a fellow country, she should not tag along with Qatar”.

The leader of the Felicity Party Mustafa Kamalak, who has been carrying his talks in Damascus for three days, talked to the Syrian Head of State Bashar Assad yesterday. The meeting, which was carried out in the Presidential Palace, lasted for approximately 40 minutes, and Kamalak presented Assad with a table with a verse from the Quran on it. During the meeting, which was carried out in a warm atmosphere, Assad sent messages to Turkey.

We Changed History

Assad, who pointed out to believe that there is no problem between the peoples during the meeting, stated that “Others have entered between Turkey and us for 90 years, and this is the first time we have had direct talks and established good relations since 2000. Mr. Sezer participated in the funeral of my father. Since then, there has been a rapid development. We changed history with Turkey in 10 years, we should not let this turn back. I paid several visits to Turkey. I saw the sympathy of the Turkish people. Reforms carry on, and they will. Everybody wants the reforms to happen faster, but it is not easy to move from a house to another one.”

We live in the same house

Stating that first of all they expected Turkey to help them but disappointed when they did not receive it, Assad said that, “We are brothers and sisters, and we live in the same house. If there is a fire in a room, the brothers and sisters in other rooms would also be damaged. We need to extinguish the fire together”.

New Constitution In February

Emphasizing that a new constitution would have been issued by February, Assad said that “We are trying our best, and a new constitution will have been issued by February. We carried out very important reforms before waiting for the new constitution. Everyone waits for the process to end as soon as possible. Even moving from a house to another one takes a great deal of time. We amended the Political Parties Law and Local Administrations Law, and while doing so, we took advantage of the laws in Turkey. However, the intention of the opposition is not the reforms, it is something else.”

We Had Great Expectations

Pointing out the fact that they had great expectations from Turkey, Assad said that, “We could not understand Turkey. Turkey is a big state, and the Turkish are loyal people. However, we have difficulty in understanding the attitude of the government in this process. I am very hopeful, this crisis will be overcome. I encourage and support the formation of opposition. We do not want a good picture of Syria from you. We would like you to tell whatever you see in Turkey, whether it is positive or negative. We desire and wish these two countries to overcome this process without ant damage. Although it seems like they have problems, the institutions and peoples of the two countries have quite good relations with each others.”

Pockets of Imperialists Filled

During the meeting, Leader of the Felicity Party Mustafa Kamalak emphasized that there should be an opposition in Syria, and “It is necessary both in Assembly and on press. We feel sorry for the foreign interferences. Pillage takes place wherever the West goes to. However, brothers should not shed each others' bloods. In Islamic countries, unfortunately the brothers kill each others. The blood shed is Muslim blood, but on the other hand, the weapons used by the two parties belong to imperialists. The Muslims are damaged, while the pockets of imperialists are filled,” he said. During his assessment to journalists after the meeting, Kamalak mentioned that there are huge differences between the Syrian picture that is seen from Turkey and the one they see when they come, and that they want to inform the government on this subject.

Turkey Should Have Sent Observer to Syria As Well

“The Arab League sent a delegation to Syria in order to monitor and observe the events in the country. Regarding the observer delegation to come to our country, we especially used the expression of Arab league and fellow countries. The Organization of the Islamic Conference (OIC) should assume an active role within the process,” Assad stated.

»» Çetiner Çetin / Damascus, Journalist – ORSAM Advisory Board Member


CATITAN SUT

Syria adalah bumi yang menghairankan dan mencabar pertimbangan aqal kita. Ianya bumi purba, mungkin di antara penempatan tamaddun manusia yang tertua, begitupun masih lagi di duduki dan raikan dengan belbagai kegiatan manusia.

Dari bumi ini lahirnya ulama terbilang zaman berzaman, semenjak dari zaman para sahabat lagi. Warisan ilmu Islam amat terasa subur melata di bumi ini. Kalau mencari ulama qiraat al-Quran, maka mereka ada di sini; kalau dicari ulama hadith yang terbilang, maka mereka ada di sini. kalau di cari ulama tasauf dan tariqah, maka mereka ada di sini. Kalau di cari ulama feqah, mereka juga ada di sini.

Di sini ada kubur para sahabat, di sini ada kubur Imam Ibn Ruslan, ada kubur Imam an-Nawawi, ada kubur Ibn Arabi, ada kubur Syaikh Abdul Ghani an-Nablusi, ada kubur Salahuddin al-Ayubbi, ada kubur Saiyyidah Zainab dan lain-lainnya.

Dalam kegemilangan sejarah ulama lampau dan kegiatan ulama semasa yang begitu meriah di bumi ini, ianya ditaqdirkan telah ditadbir oleh golongan minoriti Nusairi berwajahkan Parti Baath. Golongan minoriti yang berkuasa ini bukanlah golongan yang mesra dengan golongan agama; maklumlah dari segi agama mereka adalah golongan Nusayri, dari segi politik mereka baathi, kedua-duanya entiti ini tidak mesra agama Islam aliran Ahlu as-Sunnah. Sedangkan Ahlu as-Sunnah adalah majoriti, hampir 80% daripada penduduk bumi itu. Golongan majoriti telah terpinggir di bumi ini dari lingkaran kuasa, yang hampir sepenuhnya dikuasai oleh golongan minoriti, yang bukan sahaja menyalahi golongan majoriti bahkan mereka ketinggalan dari segi pendidikan dan peradaban berbanding golonagn majoriti .

Golongan minoriti yang berkuasa ini mempunyai hubungan baik dengan Iran, sebuah negara Syiah, walaupun bukan dari fahaman syiah yang sama. Syria berkedudukan strategi, mencelahi Iran, Turkey dan Israel: tiga negara yang mempunyai arah yang cukup ketara perbezaaannya. Nampaknya mutaakhir ini Perdana Menteri Iraq, Nuri al-Maliki, seorang syiah, juga telah menyelar Turki, dikatakan Turki campur tangan dalam urusan dalaman Iraq.

Oleh itu pimpinan Turki hari ini dilihat oleh negara-negara jirannya , Syria , Iraq mungkinnya Iran sebagai kuasa pengacau di rantau itu. Pimpinan Turki sekarang perlu dilemahkan, lagipun pemimpin Turki sejak kejatuhan Uthmaniyyah tidak sangat memberi direct impact kepada negara-negara serantau sebagaimana pimpinan hari ini; pemimpin Turki yang telah dijadikan wira ummah bagi sebahagian ummah perlu dilemahkan sebelum pengaruh gaya dan pendekatannya sempat melemahkan kuasa-kuasa pemeretah di negara-negara serantau.

Tiada hairanlah Syria membedil rakyat di dalam negaranya, dan berusaha untuk melemahkan kepimpinan semasa di Turki dari dalam Turki itu sendiri





Thursday, December 15, 2011

Sayangilah Tanahair Kita : Hindarilah Kezaliman Demi Kelangsungan Negara

وَإِذَآ أَرَدْنَآ أَن نُّهْلِكَ قَرْيَةً أَمَرْنَا مُتْرَفِيهَا فَفَسَقُواْ فِيهَا فَحَقَّ عَلَيْهَا ٱلْقَوْلُ فَدَمَّرْنَاهَا تَدْمِيراً * وَكَمْ أَهْلَكْنَا مِنَ ٱلْقُرُونِ مِن بَعْدِ نُوحٍ وَكَفَىٰ بِرَبِّكَ بِذُنُوبِ عِبَادِهِ خَبِيرَاً بَصِيراً * مَّن كَانَ يُرِيدُ ٱلْعَاجِلَةَ عَجَّلْنَا لَهُ فِيهَا مَا نَشَآءُ لِمَن نُّرِيدُ ثُمَّ جَعَلْنَا لَهُ جَهَنَّمَ يَصْلاهَا مَذْمُوماً مَّدْحُوراً

"Dan apabila Kami (Allah) mahu memusnahkan sesuatu negeri, (terlebih dahulu) Kami perentahkan golongan atasannya (untuk melakukan ketaaatan), lalu mereka mendurhakainya, maka berlakulah ke atasnya (negeri tersebut) ketetapan (yakni kemusnahan itu) , lalu Kami binasakannya sebinasa-binasanya. (16) Dan berapa banyak Kami binasakan generasi selepas Nuh, serta memadailah pengetahuan dan penglihatan Tuhan engkau tentang dosa-dosa hamba-Nya (17) Sesiapa yang mengkehendaki keuntungan yang segera (di dunia ini), maka Kami segerakan baginya apa yang Kami kehendaki, kepada sesiapa yang Kami mahu, Kemudian Kami jadikan baginya (balasan) jahannam, dia memasukki neraka secara terhina dan terhalau" (al-Isra;16-18)

Ayat ini memperingatkan kita tentang punca-punca kemusnahan sesuatu masyarakat, sesuatu tamaddun, sesuatu negara juga sesuatu kerajaan.

Allah menghantar peringatan kepada golongan atasan (yang hidup secara mewah dan melampau), semada golongan itu adalah golongan yang berkuasa atau golongan yang berharta atau golongan berpengaruh agar kembali mentaati Allah dan kembali berlaku adil, tetapi mereka engkar. Keengkaran itulah yang membuka lubang kemusnahan kepada masyarakat tersebut.

Ayat ini mengaitkan bahawa manusia melakukan sebagai-mana yang mereka lakukan, merencana sebagai yang mereka rencanakan adalah kerana mereka mahukan dan bermatlamatkan 'keuntungan yang segera' di dunia ini. Serta Allah membenarkan sebahagian matlamat-matlamat duniawi yang mereka rencanakan itu dapat dicapai mereka, dalam perkara yang berbetulan dengan apa yang Allah tentukan dan sesuai dengan siapa yang Allah tentukan. Yang menentukan natijah kepada rencana-rencana mereka yang mereka aturkan itu pada hakikatnya adalah Allah semata-mata, tetapi mereka terlindung daripada memahami hakikat ini. Dan mereka berkeyakinan rencana dan usaha merekalah yang akan menentukan natijah yang mereka akan tempuh. Untuk itu, mereka melupai nasib mereka di Akhirat kelak, mereka yakini hasil yang segera sepenuhnya berada di tangan-tangan perencanaan mereka, lalu disebabkan rencana mereka yang jahat dan buruk itulah Allah akan membalas mereka di Akhirat kelak dengan kehinaan dan terusir di dalam azab Neraka.

Mereka yang diperingatkan Allah ini adalah golongan yang berpengaruh, golongan yang mampu membuat rencana besar untuk melakukan kefasadan dalam masyarakat. Rencana mereka itulah yang menjadi penyebab sehingga menukarkan keamanan kepada huru-hara, kemakmuran kepada kesengsaraan, kasih-sayang kepada saling membenci. Rencana mereka yang menukarkan nilai-nilai serta amalan baik dalam masyarakat berubah menjadi nilai dan amalan buruk. Allah menyebut pada ar-Ra'du:11

إِنَّ ٱللَّهَ لاَ يُغَيِّرُ مَا بِقَوْمٍ حَتَّىٰ يُغَيِّرُواْ مَا بِأَنْفُسِهِمْ وَإِذَا أَرَادَ ٱللَّهُ بِقَوْمٍ سُوۤءًا فَلاَ مَرَدَّ لَهُ وَمَا لَهُمْ مِّن دُونِهِ مِن وَالٍ

Sesungguhnya Allah tidak merubah apa yang ada pada sesuatu kaum (daripada rahmat dan nikmat) sehingga mereka sendiri yang merubahnya (dengan kesyirikan, kemaksiatan serta kezaliman) , dan apabila Allah mengkehendaki keburukan (bala-bencana serta azab) pada sesuatu kaum, maka tiada yang dapat menahannya, dan tiada bagi mereka (kaum tersebut) selain daripada Allah yang menjadi penolong"

Allah menyebut dalam banyak tempat di dalam al-Quran, yang Allah memusnahkan sesuatu masyarakat kerana perbuatan zalim mereka sendiri. Kezaliman merupakan seakan-akan kata kunci kepada kemusnahan sesuatu masyarakat. Atau dalam lain perkataan kezaliman yang terdapat dalam sesuatu masyarakat itulah yang mengundang kemusnahan masyarakat tersebut. Antaranya ayat al-Qasas:59-60

وَمَا كَانَ رَبُّكَ مُهْلِكَ ٱلْقُرَىٰ حَتَّىٰ يَبْعَثَ فِيۤ أُمِّهَا رَسُولاً يَتْلُو عَلَيْهِمْ آيَاتِنَا وَمَا كُنَّا مُهْلِكِي ٱلْقُرَىٰ إِلاَّ وَأَهْلُهَا ظَالِمُونَ *وَمَآ أُوتِيتُم مِّن شَيْءٍ فَمَتَاعُ ٱلْحَيَاةِ ٱلدُّنْيَا وَزِينَتُهَا وَمَا عِندَ ٱللَّهِ خَيْرٌ وَأَبْقَىٰ أَفَلاَ تَعْقِلُونَ

Dan tiadalah Tuhan engkau memusnahkan sesuatu negeri sehingga Dia mengutuskan kepada ibu-negeri itu seoarang utusan, yang membacakan ayat-ayat Kami , dan tiadalah Kami memusnahkan sesuatu negeri kecuali penduduk-penduduknya merupakan orang-orang yang zalim. Dan apa-apa yang dianugerahkan kepada kamu dari sesuatu, maka itu hanyalah sekadar kesukaan kehidupan duniawi dan perhiasaannya. Sedangkan apa yang terdapat di sisi Allah (balasan dan pahala kebajikan) adalah lebih baik serta lebih kekal, Kenapakah engkau tiada memikirkannya?

Sudah tentu kezaliman itu mancakupi kezaliman syirik, kezaliman maksiat serta kefasikan dan juga kezaliman dalam perundangan. Kezaliman dalam perundangan disebut oleh Imam al-Ghazali di dalam kitabnya ' Nasihatu al-Muluk', antara lainnya kerajaan Parsi Purba adalah Dinasti yang beragama Majusi , tetapi mereka berlaku adil dalam pemerentahan mereka, maka dengan keadilan itulah Allah membenarkan dinasti tersebut kekal untuk demikian lama. Mereka berbangga antara lain dengan Maharaja mereka yang terkenal sebagai tersangat adil , umpama Anusyirwan, Keadilan pihak berkuasa dalam melaksanakan perundangan tersangat penting bagi kelestarian kuasa mereka sendiri.

Kita kembali kepada ayat yang terawal kita sebut (al-Isra:16-18). Terdapat sebahagian ulama memahami ayat ini dengan maksud 'dijadikan pemimpin-pemimpin mereka itu daripada golongan yang jahat", bermewah dengan harta , serta kuasa dengan secara yang tidak sewajarnya. Atau sebahagian ulama memahami dijadikan kebanyakan daripada penduduknya golongan yang rosak secara yang tidak sewajarnya (atau paling kurang orang ramai menerima amalan buruk tersebut sebagai norms dalam bermasyarakat). Allah menyebut dalam surat al-An'am :123

{ وَكَذٰلِكَ جَعَلْنَا فِي كُلِّ قَرْيَةٍ أَكَٰبِرَ مُجْرِمِيهَا لِيَمْكُرُواْ فِيهَا وَمَا يَمْكُرُونَ إِلاَّ بِأَنْفُسِهِمْ وَمَا يَشْعُرُونَ }

Dan demikian Kami jadikan pada setiap negeri pemimpin-pemimpin utama bagi penjahat-penjahatnya , untuk mereka melakukan tipu-daya pada negeri itu, tiadalah mereka memperdayakan kecuali diri mereka sendiri.

Imam Baghawi menyebut dalam menafsirkan ayat ini sebagai biasanya orang-orang jahat itu terdiri daripada orang-orang besar, sementara pengikut para rasul pula terdiri daripada golongan du 'afa' ,seumpama di Makkah pembesar-pembesar kafir Quraish akan duduk di setiap jalan masuk ke Makkah dalam kumpulan seramai 4 orang, mereka akan melakukan propaganda kepada setiap orang yang mendatangi Makkah agar "berwaspada dengan orang ini (Saiyyidina Muhammad), dia adalah seorang tukang tilik, tukang sihir dan seorang pendusta". Tetapi Allah menyebut tipu-daya pemimpin-pemimpin penjahat ini hanya akan mengena diri mereka sendiri.

Tidak semua propaganda memburukkan seseorang itu akan mencapai matlamat akhirnya sebagaimana yang direncanakan oleh yang merencanakannya bahkan hasil terakhirnya menguntungkan orang yang kena tuduh, Allah menyebut secara khusus tentang tuduhan terhadap seseorang melakukan zina tanpa bukti secara syari'ie sebagaimana dalam Surah an-Nur :11-13

إِنَّ ٱلَّذِينَ جَآءُوا بِٱلإِفْكِ عُصْبَةٌ مِّنْكُمْ لاَ تَحْسَبُوهُ شَرّاً لَّكُمْ بَلْ هُوَ خَيْرٌ لَّكُمْ لِكُلِّ ٱمْرِىءٍ مِّنْهُمْ مَّا ٱكْتَسَبَ مِنَ ٱلإِثْمِ وَٱلَّذِي تَوَلَّىٰ كِبْرَهُ مِنْهُمْ لَهُ عَذَابٌ عَظِيمٌ * لَّوْلاۤ إِذْ سَمِعْتُمُوهُ ظَنَّ ٱلْمُؤْمِنُونَ وَٱلْمُؤْمِنَاتُ بِأَنْفُسِهِمْ خَيْراً وَقَالُواْ هَـٰذَآ إِفْكٌ مُّبِينٌ * لَّوْلاَ جَآءُوا عَلَيْهِ بِأَرْبَعَةِ شُهَدَآءَ فَإِذْ لَمْ يَأْتُواْ بِالشُّهَدَآءِ فَأُوْلَـٰئِكَ عِندَ ٱللَّهِ هُمُ ٱلْكَاذِبُونَ

Sesungguhnya orang-orang yang mengadakan tuduhan (terhadap seseorang) melakukan zina secara palsu (ifik) adalah sekumpulan daripada kamu (ummat Islam sendiri), janganlah kamu mengira ianya buruk bagi kamu, bahkan ianya akan membawa kebaikan untuk kamu, bagi setiap orang daripada mereka ada mendapat bahagian daripada dosa yang mereka kerjakan, dan untuk yang mempunyai peranan utama dari kalangan mereka , baginya azab yang besar. Kenapa tidak ketika mendengarnya (tuduhan bohong itu), orang-orang mukmin dan mukminat bersangka baik terhadap diri (sebahagian daripada) mereka (yakni terhadap yang kena tuduh) dan (sepatutnya) mereka berkata :"ini adalah tuduhan jahat yang nyata". Kenapakah mereka tidak mendatang 4 orang saksi-saksi dalam tuduhan ini , maka sekiranya mereka tidak mendatang saksi-saksi tersebut, maka mereka di sisi Allah adalah pembohong

Pemimpin yang jahat akan menggunakan mekanisma propagandanya secara se-efficient mungkin menyebabkan ramai daripada orang biasa akan terpedaya sehingga tersekat daripada melihat kebenaran, membenar kezaliman mereka bahkan menyertai mereka dalam kemaksiatan. Hanyalah di Akhirat kelak , orang biasa yang telah menjadi pak turut ini ketika terhumban di dalam neraka akan mengadu kepada Allah :


يَوْمَ تُقَلَّبُ وُجُوهُهُمْ فِي ٱلنَّارِ يَقُولُونَ يٰلَيْتَنَآ أَطَعْنَا ٱللَّهَ وَأَطَعْنَا ٱلرَّسُولاَ * وَقَالُواْ رَبَّنَآ إِنَّآ أَطَعْنَا سَادَتَنَا وَكُبَرَآءَنَا فَأَضَلُّونَا ٱلسَّبِيلاْ * رَبَّنَآ آتِهِمْ ضِعْفَيْنِ مِنَ ٱلْعَذَابِ وَٱلْعَنْهُمْ لَعْناً كَبِيراً

Pada hari muka mereka dibalik-balikkan di dalam neraka, mereka berkata:"aduhai kiranya, kami telah mentaati Allah dan kami mentatati Rasul". (Lalu )mereka mengadu :"Wahai Tuhan kami, kami telah mematuhi ketua-ketua kami dan pembesar-pembesar kami, maka mereka telah menyesatkan kami, Wahai Tuhan kami berilah kepada mereka azab yang berganda serta laknatlah mereka dengan laknat yang besar
" (al-Ahzab:66-68)

هٱحْشُرُواْ ٱلَّذِينَ ظَلَمُواْ وَأَزْوَاجَهُمْ وَمَا كَانُواْ يَعْبُدُونَ * مِن دُونِ ٱللَّهِ فَٱهْدُوهُمْ إِلَىٰ صِرَاطِ ٱلْجَحِيمِ * وَقِفُوهُمْ إِنَّهُمْ مَّسْئُولُونَ * مَا لَكُمْ لاَ تَنَاصَرُونَ * بَلْ هُمُ ٱلْيَوْمَ مُسْتَسْلِمُونَ * وَأَقْبَلَ بَعْضُهُمْ عَلَىٰ بَعْضٍ يَتَسَآءَلُونَ * قَالُوۤاْ إِنَّكُمْ كُنتُمْ تَأْتُونَنَا عَنِ ٱلْيَمِينِ * قَالُواْ بَلْ لَّمْ تَكُونُواْ مُؤْمِنِينَ * وَمَا كَانَ لَنَا عَلَيْكُمْ مِّن سُلْطَانٍ بَلْ كُنتُمْ قَوْماً طَاغِينَ * فَحَقَّ عَلَيْنَا قَوْلُ رَبِّنَآ إِنَّا لَذَآئِقُونَ * فَأَغْوَيْنَاكُمْ إِنَّا كُنَّا غَاوِينَ * فَإِنَّهُمْ يَوْمَئِذٍ فِي ٱلْعَذَابِ مُشْتَرِكُونَ * إِنَّا كَذَلِكَ نَفْعَلُ بِٱلْمُجْرِمِينَ

(Allah memerentah malaikat):"himpunkanlah mereka yang zalim beserta rakan kongsi mereka dan sembahan-sembahan yang mereka sembahi, selain daripada Allah, maka tunjuki mereka jalan ke neraka. Dan tahanlah mereka, untuk mereka disoal. "kenapa kamu (sekarang) tidak bantu membantu?". "Bahkan kamu pada hari ini hanya menyerah diri?" Dan mereka hadap menghadap saling menyoal. (Golongan pengikut) mereka berkata: "sesungguhnya kamu adalah dulunya mendatangi kami dari sebelah kanan (menggunakan kekuasaan yang kamu ada)". (Golongan pemimpin) menjawab:"bahkan kamu (juga) bukannya daripada golongan yang beriman" (yakni jangan salahkan kami). "Dan kami tiada mempunyai ke atas kamu penguasaan sekali-kali, bahkan kamu sendiri adalah golongan yang melampaui batasan". "maka terjadilah ke atas kita semua ketentuan Tuhan kita, sesungguhnya kita (terpaksa) merasai azab tersebut". "Maka kami telah menyesatkan kamu, (kerana) sesungguhnya kami sendiri telah tersesat." Maka mereka (pemimpin dan pengikut) pada Hari ini berkongsi azab. Sesungguhnya demikianlah Kami (Allah) berbuat terhadap golongan yang jahat. As-Soffat:22-24

هَـٰذَا فَوْجٌ مُّقْتَحِمٌ مَّعَكُمْ لاَ مَرْحَباً بِهِمْ إِنَّهُمْ صَالُواْ ٱلنَّارِ * قَالُواْ بَلْ أَنتُمْ لاَ مَرْحَباً بِكُمْ أَنتُمْ قَدَّمْتُمُوهُ لَنَا فَبِئْسَ ٱلْقَرَارُ * قَالُواْ رَبَّنَا مَن قَدَّمَ لَنَا هَـٰذَا فَزِدْهُ عَذَاباً ضِعْفاً فِي ٱلنَّارِ * وَقَالُواْ مَا لَنَا لاَ نَرَىٰ رِجَالاً كُنَّا نَعُدُّهُمْ مِّنَ ٱلأَشْرَارِ * أَتَّخَذْنَاهُمْ سِخْرِيّاً أَمْ زَاغَتْ عَنْهُمُ ٱلأَبْصَار * إِنَّ ذَلِكَ لَحَقٌّ تَخَاصُمُ أَهْلِ ٱلنَّارِ

(Di katakan kepada para pemimpin jahat itu): "ini lah gerombolan pengikut kamu yang berdesak-desak bersama kamu (untuk dihumban dalam neraka)". Pemimpin-pemimpin tersebut mengatakan :"Tiada ucapan selamat datang bagi mereka kerana sesungguhnya mereka akan dihumban ke neraka". (Para pengikut) mereka menjawab: : "bahkan bagi kamulah tiada ucapan selamat datang , kamulah yang mencampakkan kami ke dalamnya (neraka)",maka neraka itu adalah seburuk-buruk kediaman. (Para Pengikut mengadu kepada Tuhan) berkata: "wahai Tuhan kami, sesiapa yang menjerumuskan kami ke dalam (azab) ini, maka Engkau gandakan azab baginya di dalam neraka". Mereka berkata: "kenapa kami tidak melihat lelaki-lelaki yang kami anggap (di dunia dahulunya) sebagai orang-orang yang hina (yakni orang-orang yang beriman dan melakukan kebajikan berada bersama di dalam neraka ini)?"Bukankah mereka dahulunya kami olok-olokan,, atau mereka sahaja tidak kelihatan pada pandangan kami (bersama mereka dalam neraka)". Sesungguhnya (demikian) itu adalah yang pasti terjadi, (iaitu) pertengkaran di kalangan penghuni neraka' Sad: 59-64

Kita mengharapkan rahmat Tuhan agar kita belum lagi berada dalam suasana yang telah disebut oleh Rasulullah Sollallahu 'alaihi wasallam :
"Dengarlah oleh kamu sekelian, akan ada selepas aku ini penguasa-penguasa: yang barang siapa masuk menjumpai mereka dan mengiyakan mereka dalam pembohongan mereka, dan menolong mereka ke atas kezaliman mereka, maka dia bukan daripada aku, dan aku bukan daripadanya, dan tiadalah aku memberi minum kepadanya di kolam Haudh. barang siapa yang tidak masuk menemuinya, tidak menolong mereka atas kezaliman mereka, tidak mengiyakan pembohongan mereka, maka dia daripada aku dan aku daripadanya, dan akau akan memberi minum kepadanya di kolam Haudh" (Riwayat Imam an-Nisai dan Imam at-Tarmizi dan beliau berkata hadith ini hasan lagi sahih). Imam al-Hafiz Syarafuddin ad-Damyati (w:705H) telah mendatangkan 4 hadith yang lafaznya hampir semakna denganm hadith yang telah tersebut dalam kitabnya :al-Matju ar-Rabihu fi Thawabi al-'amali as-Solehi.

Hadith-hadith tersebut secara jelas melarang kita daripada mendampingi apa lagi menyokong penguasa-penguasa yang berbohong dan melakuklan kezaliman. Sehingga Rasulullah Sollallahu 'alaihi wasallam tidak mengaku mereka yang berbuat perbuatan yang terlarang itu sebagai ummat

Dalam sebuah hadith riwayat Imam at-Tabrani :
"Akan datang pada akhir zaman : penguasa-penguasa yang zalim, menteri-menteri yang fasiq , hakim-hakim yang curang, ulama yang berbohong, maka sesiapa daripada kamu mendapati zaman itu, maka janganlah bertugas dengan mereka itu sebagai pengutip hasil (jaliyan), jangan sebagai pengawai atasan ('arifan), dan sebagai soldadu (Syartiyan)". (hadith ini disebut oleh Imam at-Tabrani di dalam Mu'jamu al-Kabir; kemudian dipetik oleh Muhammad Waliyullah Abdul Rahman an-Nadwi dalam Nuba atu ar-Rasul)

Kita mungkin sahaja menerima bahawa kezaliman ke atas seseorang secara khusus masih boleh diterima , asalkan kezaliman itu tidak menjadi sebahagian amalan resmi masyarakat kita. Kita terkhayal mungkin terdapat ruang untuk menzalimi orang tertentu, asalkan kita bukan menzalimi semua orang. Bagaimanapun Allah mengajar kita tentang ketetapan-Nya yang telah menafi dan menolak anggapan tersebut. Tidakkah kita takut kepada balasan dari Allah? :

مِنْ أَجْلِ ذٰلِكَ كَتَبْنَا عَلَىٰ بَنِيۤ إِسْرَائِيلَ أَنَّهُ مَن قَتَلَ نَفْساً بِغَيْرِ نَفْسٍ أَوْ فَسَادٍ فِي ٱلأَرْضِ فَكَأَنَّمَا قَتَلَ ٱلنَّاسَ جَمِيعاً وَمَنْ أَحْيَاهَا فَكَأَنَّمَا أَحْيَا النَّاسَ جَمِيعاً وَلَقَدْ جَآءَتْهُمْ رُسُلُنَا بِٱلّبَيِّنَٰتِ ثُمَّ إِنَّ كَثِيراً مِّنْهُمْ بَعْدَ ذٰلِكَ فِي ٱلأَرْضِ لَمُسْرِفُونَ

Oleh yang demikian, Kami (Allah) tetapkan ke atas Bani Israel sesungguhnya barang siapa membunuh suatu jiwa bukan (sebagai balasan terhadap pembunuhan) jiwa (yang lain) atau kerana (hukuman) melakukan kerosakan di bumi, maka sesungguhnya serupalah dia membunuh manusia keseluruhannya, barang siapa yang memberi kehidupan pada satu jiwa serupalah dia menghidupkan manusia seluruhnya, Dan sesungguhnya telah datng kepada mereka para rasul Kami dengan penjelasan, kemudian selepas ( penjelasaan )itu mereka bersikap keterlaluan di bumi (al-Maidah:32)

Kita berkewajiban secara agamanya untuk mencegah kezaliman secara khusus terhadap seseorang sebagaimana kita berkewajiban menentang kezaliman terhadap manusia seluruhnya. Tidak layak sekali bagi orang beriman untuk meredai dan membiarkan kezaliman berakar dan mencengkam urat-saraf masyarakat kita.

Rasulullah Sollallahu 'alaihi wasallam memperingatkan kita tentang akibat kezaliman:
"Bertaqwalah daripada (terlibat dengan) kezaliman, maka sesungguhnya kezaliman adalah kegelapan pada Hari Qiyamat" (riwayat Imam Muslim di petik daripada Riyadu as-Solihin : hadith 210 )

Sehingga baginda bersabda yang bukan sahaja kita perlu takutkan kegelitaan nasib kita di Akhirat , bahkan kita perlu takut kepada doa mereka yang kita zalimi, Rasulullah Sollallahu 'alaihi wasallam bersabda:
"Bertaqwalah daripada doa-doa mangsa kezaliman, maka sesungguhnya tiada hijab antara doa tersebut dengan Allah" (muttafaqun 'alaihi: dipetik daripada Riyadu as-Solihin : hadith 215)

Antara yang mendorong pihak berkuasa untuk bertindak secara zalim terhadap orang lain tanpa mengenal batasan halal-haram, tanpa menghiraukan adab susila adalah kekhuatiran mereka akan kehilangan kuasa, rasa terancam kekuatan mereka, bimbang keburukan mereka akan terbongkar dan lain-lain pertimbangan paras sebab-musabbab di peringkat manusiawi semata-mata . Obsesiti ini perlu dirawat dengan mengingatkan firman Allah:

قُلِ ٱللَّهُمَّ مَالِكَ ٱلْمُلْكِ تُؤْتِي ٱلْمُلْكَ مَن تَشَآءُ وَتَنزِعُ ٱلْمُلْكَ مِمَّنْ تَشَآءُ وَتُعِزُّ مَن تَشَآءُ وَتُذِلُّ مَن تَشَآءُ بِيَدِكَ ٱلْخَيْرُ إِنَّكَ عَلَىٰ كُلِّ شَيْءٍ قَدِيرٌ


Katakan Allahumma, (yang menjadi)Penguasa kerajaan ! Engkau (Allah) memberi kerajaan kepada siapa yang Engkau kehendaki, dan Engkau melucutkan kerajaan dari siapa yang Engkau kehendaki, Engkau muliakan sesiapa yang Engkau kehendaki dan Engkau hinakan sesiapa yang Engkau kehendaki, Di Tangan (kekuasaan) Engkaulah kebaikan, sesungguhnya Engkau di atas setiap sesuatu Maha Berkuasa
(ali-'Imran:26)

Hendaknya janganlah pihak yang masih berkuasa sanggup melakukan kezaliman atas alasan mahu mempertankan kekuasaan mereka, begitu juga pihak yang mengangan-angankan kekuasaan juga hendaklah menghindari kezaliman. Masing-masing pihak hanya akan mendapat hasil serta natijah dari usaha-usaha mereka, walaupun sehebat dan serapi mana sekalipun perencanaannya , natijah yang akan mereka perolehi akan berdasarkan ketentuan taqdir yang telah Allah putuskan, tiada lebih dan tiada kurang. Bahkan yang lebih tentunya kita semua dari pihak mana sekalipun, semada di pihak yang sedang berkuasa mahupun yang tidak berkuasa akan berdepan dengan Pengadilan Allah yang Maha Adil, Maha Pemurah dan Maha Keras hukuman-Nya untuk diputuskan balasan yang setimpal dengan keburukan kita, dan digandakan ganjarannya untuk kebajikan yang kita lakukan. Bukankah kita pernah bertemu hadith-hadith yang menyebut cerita tentang seorang perempuan jalang menolong memberi minum kepada anjing yang dahaga telah ditilik Allah dengan rahmat dan dimasukkan ke dalam syurga- atau cerita seorang itu mendapat murka kerana kezalimannya yang mengurung seekor kucing di dalam rumah tanpa memberi makan sehingga kucing itu mati kelaparan?. Sekarang ini kita bukan setakat berdepan cerita anjing dan kucing- tetapi kita berdepan dengan cerita tentang manusia: apakah tindakan yang akan diambil akan mengundang rahmat daripada Allah atau sebaliknya kemurkaan daripada Allah.

Kita wajib menolak kemungkaran, kita wajib mencegahkan kefasadan. Termasuklah kita wajib menyediakan sistem kehakiman kita yang menghukum kemaksiatan, kemungkaran dan kefasadan agar kebaikan akan terserlah. Bagaimanapun dalam menghukumi kefasadan, kemaksiatan itu , sistem kehakiman kita perlu adil, perlu bertindak secara objektif tanpa senget ke mana-mana. Sebenar-benarnya tidak ada kebaikan kecuali keburukan apabila kezaliman digunakan atas nama menghapuskan kemaksiatan. Ketidak-adilan itu sendiri adalah kezaliman, kemaksiatan dan mengundang murka Allah. Kita perlu tegas dalam meroboh kemungkaran tetapi kita diharamkan daripada melakukan kezaliman. Perlaksanaan hukuman mestilah berdasarkan keadilan dan kesaksamaan bukan berdasarkan kepentingan dan tekanan.Antara lain allah memperingatkan kita:

إِنَّ ٱللَّهَ يَأْمُرُ بِٱلْعَدْلِ وَٱلإحْسَانِ وَإِيتَآءِ ذِي ٱلْقُرْبَىٰ وَيَنْهَىٰ عَنِ ٱلْفَحْشَاءِ وَٱلْمُنْكَرِ وَٱلْبَغْيِ يَعِظُكُمْ لَعَلَّكُمْ تَذَكَّرُو

Sesungguhnya Allah memerentah agar ditegakkan keadilan, membuat kebajikan, menunaikan tanggung-jawab terhadap kerabat, serta mencegah kejelekan , kemungkaran dan kezaliman. Dia memberi penerangan kepada kamu moga-moga kamu mendapat peringatan (an-Nahl:90)

Ada di kalangan kita yang berfikir: "bagaimana mungkin hukuman yang adil dibuat dalam sistem perundangan yang pincang ". Sebenarnya dalam apa bentuk suasana dan sistempun kita wajib menengakkan keadilan semampu mungkin. Kekuatan cintakan kebenaran dan keadilan itu akan mendorong kita membuat keputusan dan penghakiman yang seadil mungkin. Imam Hassan al-Banna menyebut dalam rencana 'Fikratu al-Iqtisadiyyatu fi Kitabilah" (yang dimuatkan dalam buku Hadithu al-Thulathah':m/s:402):

"Sesungguhnya hakim yang adil, wahai saudara, di depannya perundangan yang curang, bagaimanapun jiwanya yang luhur serta keikhlasannya untuk keadilan dan kecintaannya terhadap keadilan akan mendorong dia (hakim tersebut) untuk manipulasi teks undang-undang yang curang itu bagi memutuskan hukuman yang adil... mungkin juga ada seorang hakim yang berjiwa fasid (jahat) serta mengikut hawa-nafsu berada di dalam perundangan yang adil , bagaimanapun jiwanya yang fasid itu akan mendorong dia untuk manipulasi teks undang-undang yang adil itu bagi memutuskan hukaman yang zalim yang muafakat" dengan hawa-nafsunya"

Semua yang terlibat memegang amanah dan kuasa hendaklah melaksanakan amanah dan keadilan walaupun terhadap sanak-saudara tanpa membenarkan perasaan kasih mempengaruhi tugasan, begitu juga terhadap mereka yang dimusuhi tanpa membenarkan perasaan benci mempengaruhi tugasan. Allah berfirman:

إِنَّ ٱللَّهَ يَأْمُرُكُمْ أَن تُؤدُّواْ ٱلأَمَانَاتِ إِلَىۤ أَهْلِهَا وَإِذَا حَكَمْتُمْ بَيْنَ ٱلنَّاسِ أَن تَحْكُمُواْ بِٱلْعَدْلِ إِنَّ ٱللَّهَ نِعِمَّا يَعِظُكُمْ بِهِ إِنَّ ٱللَّهَ كَانَ سَمِيعاً بَصِيراً

Sesungguhnya Allah memerentahkan kamu agar menunaikan amanah kepada ahlinya, dan apabila kamu berhukum, hendaklah kamu berhukum dengan adil. Sesungguhnya Allah memberi peringatan yang sebaik-baik kepada kamu, sesungguhnya Allah Maha Mendengar Maha Melihat (an-Nisa':58)

يَٰأَيُّهَا ٱلَّذِينَ آمَنُواْ كُونُواْ قَوَّٰمِينَ بِٱلْقِسْطِ شُهَدَآءَ للَّهِ وَلَوْ عَلَىۤ أَنْفُسِكُمْ أَوِ ٱلْوَٰلِدَيْنِ وَٱلأَقْرَبِينَ إِن يَكُنْ غَنِيّاً أَوْ فَقِيراً فَٱللَّهُ أَوْلَىٰ بِهِمَا فَلاَ تَتَّبِعُواْ ٱلْهَوَىٰ أَن تَعْدِلُواْ وَإِن تَلْوُواْ أَوْ تُعْرِضُواْ فَإِنَّ ٱللَّهَ كَانَ بِمَا تَعْمَلُونَ خَبِيراً

Wahai orang-orang yang beriman, hendaklah kamu benar-benar tegakkan keadilan sebagai i saksi bagi Allah, meskipun atas diri kamu sendiri atau ibu-bapa kamu atau kaum-kerabat kamu. (sekiranya) jika dia (yang kena dakwa itu) kaya ataupun miskin, maka Allah lebih (tahu kemaslahatan) keduanya. Janganlah kamu mengikut hawa-nafsu (sehingga terhalang) daripada berlaku adil. Dan jika kamu memutar-balikkan atau menolak (dberlaku adil), maka sesungguhnya Allah Maha Mengetahui apa yang kamu kerjakan


يَا أَيُّهَآ ٱلَّذِينَ آمَنُواْ كُونُواْ قَوَّامِينَ للَّهِ شُهَدَآءَ بِٱلْقِسْطِ وَلاَ يَجْرِمَنَّكُمْ شَنَآنُ قَوْمٍ عَلَىۤ أَلاَّ تَعْدِلُواْ ٱعْدِلُواْ هُوَ أَقْرَبُ لِلتَّقْوَىٰ وَٱتَّقُواْ ٱللَّهَ إِنَّ ٱللَّهَ خَبِيرٌ بِمَا تَعْمَلُونَ


Wahai orang yang beriman, hendaklah kamu benar-benar menjadi saksi kepada Allah dalam menegakkan keadilan . Janganlah
sekali-kali kebencian kamu terhadap sesuatu kaum itu memesongkan kamu daripada berlaku adil, Hendaklah kmau berlaku adil (kepada siapa jua pun), ia (perbuatan adil itu) terlebih hampir kepafa taqwa, maka bertaqwalah kepada Allah. Sesungguhnya Allah Maha Mengetahui segala yang kamu lakukan (al- Maidah:8)

Kita hendaklah dengan insafnya mengaku yang masyarakat dan diri kita sentiasa terdedah kepada kebinasaan, kita tidak mempunyai apa-apa pendinding dari murka Allah kecuali dengan apa yang telah disebut oleh Allah dan Rasul-Nya. Allah telah memperingatkan kita:

وَكَمْ أَهْلَكْنَا قَبْلَهُمْ مِّن قَرْنٍ هُمْ أَشَدُّ مِنْهُم بَطْشاً فَنَقَّبُواْ فِي ٱلْبِلاَدِ هَلْ مِن مَّحِيصٍ *
إِنَّ فِي ذَلِكَ لَذِكْرَىٰ لِمَن كَانَ لَهُ قَلْبٌ أَوْ أَلْقَى ٱلسَّمْعَ وَهُوَ شَهِيدٌ

Dan berapa banyak (masyarakat) dari generasi yang lalu Kami telah binasakan (kerana kedurhakaan mereka) , mereka itu lebih perkasa daripada mereka (yang ada sekarang). Maka (kemudiannya) kaum itu telah mencari perlindungan di merata negeri, adakah terdapat tempat yang mereka dapat menyelamatkan diri?. Sesunguhnya pada yang demikian itu merupakan peringatan bagi sesiapa yang mempunyai hati atau yang dengan bersungguh-sungguh menggunakan pendengarannya sedangkan dia menjadi saksi (kepada kebenaran kenyataan ters ebut) (al-Qaf:36-37)


Moga-moga Allah memberi kita hidayah dengan kebenaran serta ditaufiqkan kita untuk beramal dengan agama-Nya. Kita berdoa agar Allah tidak menyertakan kita dalam golongan yang zalim, serta Allah menilik kita dengan rahmat serta kelembutan sehingga kita dan masyarakat kita tidak terbinasa kerana kezaliman-kezaliman yang kita telah lakukan. Semoga Allah memberi kita kesempatan untuk membetulkan apa-apa yang perlu diperbetulkan, mengampunkan dosa-dosa kita dan memasukkan kita ke dalam keredaan-Nya.

Friday, December 9, 2011

Gender Issues: Unfinished & unparallel businesses

Gender equality a key tool to accomplishing economic goals

ISTANBUL - Hürriyet Daily News

Turkey, currently lagging behind the world average for women in the workforce, should pursue gender equality policies with determination if it wants to reach the economic targets it set for 2023, says Nur Ger. A recent World Bank report shows pursuing gender equality is smart economics, says Ger from a top business group

‘We are very sensitive to mothers in our company,” says Nur Ger (R) talking to the Daily News in her office at the top of a textile facility. As the owner of her own company, she is also active in several NGO’s. DAILY NEWS photo, Emrah GÜREL

‘We are very sensitive to mothers in our company,” says Nur Ger (R) talking to the Daily News in her office at the top of a textile facility. As the owner of her own company, she is also active in several NGO’s. DAILY NEWS photo, Emrah GÜREL

Barçın Yinanç barcin.yinanc@hurriyet.com.tr
The government should stop seeing gender equality as an issue of social policy if it wants to reach its aim of becoming the 10th biggest economy in the world, said Nur Ger, a top Turkish businesswoman.
Achieving gender equality is a tool for economic development, and a recent report from the World Bank proves this argument based on economic parameters, said Ger, the head of the gender equality working group of Turkish Industry & Business Association (TÜSİAD).

The World Development Report 2012 released last week looked at the issue of development from perspective of gender equality. According to the report under-investing in girls and women puts a brake on poverty reduction and limits economic and social development.

“We lag behind world average in women in labor force. An additional 5 percent of female participation in the labor force would reduce poverty by 15 percent,” Ger told the Daily News in a recent interview.

Q: What does the report tell you?

A: It tells that women’s problems are the same everywhere in the world and that there is a correlation between these problems and poverty. Women and their children have higher levels of suffering in direct proportion to the level of poverty.

Women constitute 12 percent of the CEOs in Turkey and that is higher than the world average, which is at 5 percent for OECD member countries.
Q: What does it tell us about Turkey?

A: The report focuses on the economics of gender equality. [If] female participation in the labor force [went up] 5 percent, poverty would be reduced 15 percent. In Turkey we transformed the economy in such a successful way that it has become a leading light, while other countries are in crisis. We did this through our determination. You can achieve results if you pursue economic policies with persistency, nd adopting a holistic approach. We have become the [world’] 16th biggest economy, we want to become the 10th biggest economy. The report says to countries, “If you allow your women up to the next level, this will speed up your economic transformation.”

It also tells us not to see gender equality as a social policy issue: gender equality is smart economics. I want to repeat this message for Turkey: gender equality should be a tool for development.

Q: In other words, it should be an essential aim in order to reach the goal of becoming the 10th biggest economy?

It will be a nearly impossible goal to reach with the current level of gender inequality. Yet gender equality should be a primary consideration when trying to reach our economic development goals. They are saying it takes a long time to achieve results in social policies but in 10 years, we registered a change of 100 years in the economy. No one can convince me that it will still take 20 or 30 years to register change if we pursue gender equality policies with determination.

Is there any sign that the government might see gender equality as an economic development tool?

A: The prevailing view is this: First let’s deal with the economy and then we will deal with social policies. It’s not just this government, but previous governments have had a similar approach.

We need a reverse approach; we need to use the transformative effect of social policies on the economy.

It seems the share of female participation in the workforce does not provide room for optimism.
The minister put the ratio of women at 30 percent, but the data we have states 26 percent. The government’s target is to increase this to 34 percent, while TÜSİAD says we can pull it up to 40 percent. The world average is 50 percent. So Turkey has already accepted gender disparity in its targeting. Indeed, according to these guidelines, by 2023, Turkey will be 10 percent below the world average. Even the targets we set are not ambitious.

Q: If Turkey cannot reach the world average in gender equality, it will probably not be possible to reach the economic targets it has given itself for 2023, no?

A: As much as we say this, we cannot convince the politicians. At one stage the rhetoric was, “Our unemployment statistics would have looked better if women did not demand to work so much.” At other times we were told, “The economy has improved and male income has increased. Women have therefore stopped working since economically it is no longer necessary for them to work.” This is the sort of mentality we have, yet both men and women need to see that women should participate in the labor force, not because the household needs the income but because this is a way of living and being.

The prime minister calls for women to have three children and has said he does not believe in gender equality. Is one of the problems the conservative nature of the government?

This is not only the view of this government, however. It would be unfair to say the prime minister is conservative when society itself is conservative and the prime minister represents this conservative part of society.

DAILY NEWS photo, Emrah GÜREL


Q: What are the priorities for increasing women’s share in the labor force?

A: The first thing is childcare. We need to have daycare centers in every neighborhood, and they need to be affordable based on income levels. Women need to be able to leave their children with full confidence; what woman can work with full efficiency if she has anxieties about the kids she left behind? The ratio of childcare is only 12 percent, and this is 12 percent out of the 26 percent of women who are working.

So women do want to work?

Women want to work but there are also traditions, with family members asking, “Why do you need to work?” – just as my family asked me why I was establishing my own company. But traditions can be overcome.

Q: Is there any governmental action to increase female participation in the workforce?

A: In their program they have promised to give financial assistance to working mothers. I am actually optimistic, especially because of the words of Fatma Şahin, the minister responsible for women and families. Nevertheless, we need to speed up the implementation.

Q: What should the private sector do?

A: Gender equality should become the norm, an important value, just as, let’s say, the environment became an important component of the business world. Recruitment, wage policies as well as promotions should be transparent. Flexible work can provide the possibility of keeping women in the labor force. But this should not be perceived as simply a possibility designed only for women and a disadvantage to them in their careers.

Q: Isn’t there anything positive about the position of women in the labor force?

A: On the contrary. Women constitute 12 percent of the CEOs in Turkey and that is higher than the world average, which is at 5 percent for OECD member countries.

Q: What’s your view on Minister Fatma Şahin?

A: I really appreciate her because she is very well informed. She accepts we have a lot of homework to do. She asks for contributions from civil society. The one thing I criticize is when she calls for patience.

But we need to act fast, not with patience.

Who is Nur Ger?

A graduate of Boğaziçi University, Nur Ger started her business career very early. After having worked at various textile companies, she formed her own company in 1986. She headed the Turkish Clothing Manufacturers’ Association from 1994 to 1996., when critical talks led to Turkey’s full entry into the customs union with the EU.

She is a founding member of the Association for the Support and Training of Women Candidates (Ka-Der) and the Women Entrepreneurs Association of Turkey (KAGİDER).
She is currently the head of the gender equality working group of the Turkish Industry & Business Association (TÜSİAD).

In 2000 she received the award for most successful businesswoman by daily Dünya, a prominent financial newspaper
.


Catitan Sut:

Isu feminism, isu gender equality adalah isu lama. umpamanya kalau di Turkey, semenjak zaman Kamal Attartuk lagi Kamal telah membuka seluas-luas pintu kepada persamaan hak antara lelekai dan perempuan. isterinya, Zubaidah dikatakan bukan sahaja aktif dalam masyarakat, bahkan berada di garisan depan ketika perang. Sepatutnya isu ini telah lama selesai di Turkey.

Bahkan di Barat sekalipun, isu ini masih merupakan isu yang masih relevan, Kalau dulunya ada penyokong feminism berhimpun untuk membakar bra, seakan-akan bra itu melambangkan keterikatan golongan wanita. Mereka melaungkan slogan yang mereka tidak memerlukan kepada lelaki, Sehingga-hingga dalam kehidupan sex pun, ada mereka yang cenderung kepada amalan lesbian.

Dalam masyarakat kita pula, Syed Syaikh Abdul Hadi adalah antara tokoh awal yang menceritakan tentang gerakan feminism dalam novel sadurannya Faridah Hanum, Begitu juga Ustaz Abu Bakar Syaarie, pelopor Gerakan Kaum Muda di Perlis yang menulis buku Gerakan Kaum Ibu yang menyaran aktiviti-aktiviti kaum wanita, Ustaz menasihati agar wanita bersenam dengan umpama bermain badminton dan menjaga kulit dengan menggunakan milk of magnolia, hanya seingat saya , ustaz ini tidak menyebut tentang kewajiban menutup aurat.

Kemuncak gerakan feminism yang berwarnakan agama agaknya kemunculan sisters in Islam pada awal tahun 1990'an. Ianya diketuai oleh Dr. Fatimah Wadud, seorang ahli akademik yang agak terasing dari segi fahamnya, dalam lapuran NST pada awal penubuhan SIS, seingatnya Dr.Fatimah mempersoalkan pegangan yang Saiyyidina Adam , seorang lelaki, adalah manusia yang terawal dijadikan Tuhan, Aduhai sehingga kemudiannya kita baca kisah bagaimana Dr.Fatimah menjadi imam sembahyang jumaat bagi makmum yang terdiri daripada lelaki dan perempuan.

Kenapa kita perlu melihat peranan lelaki-perempuan yang dilihat secara berlawanan dan bertentangan?. Kenapa kita tidak melihatnya sebagai complimentary relationship yang lengkap-melengkapi? Kita sedar yang memang terdapat perbezaan antara lelaki dan perempuan dari peringkat DNA-nya lagi, biological-nya memang lelaki berbeza dari perempuan. Perbezaan ini bukan untuk mereka menimbulkan ketegangan antara mereka, tetapi masing-masing ada peranan masing-masing dalam cara khusus masing-masing.

Sebagai makhluk ibadat, peranan lelaki dan perempuan tidak banyak berbeza. Mereka perlu memenuhi kehidupan mereka sesuai dengan tujuan kejadian mereka untuk mengabdikan diri masing-masing kepada Allah. Keikhlasan mereka sangat asas, perbuatan amalan mereka perlu ditentukan dan dibimbing oleh al-Quran, kehidupan sebenar mereka adalah selepas kematian mereka, Mereka meminta reda Allah dan balasan syurga-Nya, mereka minta berlindung dari murka-Nya dan neraka walaupun peranan khusus mereka mungkin sahaja berbeza-beza.

Kita perlu mengetahui kengkangan budaya yang menghimpit wanita yang sebenarnya bukan dari ajaran Islam, kita perlu mengetahui pelanggaran batasan yang dianjurkan kepada wanita yang bukan daripada ajaran Islam. Semoga muslimin dan muslimat, mukminin dan mukminat, zakirin dan zakirat, so-iminin dan so-imat, akan berganding bahu dalam usaha-usaha menyubur yang makruf, mencegah kemungkaran dan membina iman di dalam diri, ummah dan dunia







Wednesday, November 30, 2011

Kemenangan Pilihanraya Bagi Ikhwan :mimpi ngeri bagi sebahagian

Business leaders ponder effects of Islamist parliament

Despite the Muslim Brotherhood's support of a free market economy, their expected success in parliamentary polls has the business sector bracing itself for an incoming parliament dominated by Islamists
Marwa Hussein, Bassem Abo Alabass, Wednesday 30 Nov 2011
parliamentary elections
An Egyptian man looks at a campaign banner in Arabic that reads, "The Freedom and Justice party," on the second day of parliamentary elections in Alexandria (Photo: AP)

Preliminary ‎indications suggest strong electoral showings by ‎‎Islamist candidates, especially those from the Muslim ‎Brotherhood’s ‎Freedom and Justice Party (FJP), in ‎Egypt’s first ‎post-Mubarak parliamentary polls.‎ Businesspeople, meanwhile, ‎are wondering how Egypt’s economy would be affected by an ‎Islamist landslide.‎

‎“Of course, I have some fears,” Bahgat El-Hossamy, legal ‎advisor to Egypt’s Junior Business Association, told Ahram ‎Online. “But if the rotation of power is guaranteed, my concerns ‎will be reduced.”‎

The Muslim Brotherhood (MB) has repeatedly stressed its ‎commitment to a free market economy. The group says that it ‎supports development by encouraging the private sector, ‎attracting foreign investment and promoting national exports. ‎

Key items in the MB’s political platform include calls for a free ‎economy that nevertheless ensures social justice, respect for ‎international conventions that are in the country’s best interest, ‎and the encouragement of labour-intensive industries.‎

To satisfy Egypt’s middle class, which constitutes an important ‎part of the MB’s membership base, the group has not altered its ‎main economic policies, some of which had been espoused by ‎the former regime. It calls for the application of a progressive tax ‎and the restructuring of Egypt’s tax-collection system, as wells ‎as the setting of a national minimum wage. It neglects to ‎mention, however, a maximum wage.‎

The MB has also promised subsidies and customs exemptions ‎for labour-intensive industries.‎

“The MB might halt some economic activities that it believes to ‎be incompatible with Islamic Law, but it won’t stand against ‎private property,” said El-Hossamy.‎

El-Hossamy, for his part, will not be surprised to see the MB ‎arrive to power after being the largest and best-organised ‎opposition movement for decades.‎

‎“It was necessary that they come to power to put an end to the ‎legend,” he said. “But if they don’t serve the popular will, they ‎won’t be elected in the next elections.”‎

A self-avowed liberal, El-Hossamy is more concerned about the ‎influence of Egypt’s Salafist trend. ‎

“It appears that the Salafists will capture more seats in ‎parliament than originally expected,” he said. “My concern is that ‎if the Islamists win a parliamentary majority, they could ‎conceivably pass legislation cancelling bank interest rates or ‎prohibiting alcohol, which would deeply impact the tourism ‎sector.”‎

Ultimately, though, says El-Hossamy, the MB does not stand ‎against economic liberalization. In fact, he points out, the ‎group’s economic program isn’t much different from that of ‎ousted president Hosni Mubarak’s National Democratic Party.‎

Leading MB businessman Hasan Malek once told Reuters that ‎promoting manufacturing, bolstering national human resources, ‎and encouraging the private sector represented “the solutions to ‎Egypt's economic slump.”‎

One of the MB’s main financiers and business strategists, Malek ‎said the economic policies associated with the Mubarak era ‎were “on the right track,” but had been overshadowed by the ‎former regime’s blatant corruption and nepotism.‎

Mohamed El-Rachidi, chairman of the Gozour processed food ‎company, a sub-group of the Citadel Capital financial group, isn’t ‎very optimistic about the preliminary polling results.‎

‎“The MB has good economic sense. I work in the food industry, ‎which will survive in any case since people will always need to ‎eat,” he said. “The problem will be with short-term disruptions in ‎the coming period.”‎

‎“It will take months for elections to wrap up and for a new ‎constitution to be written,” he added. “Many businesses may be ‎forced to close before then.”‎

Tourism concerns

Egyptian tourism officials, meanwhile, express fears for the ‎future of Egypt’s once-thriving tourism industry if elections are ‎swept by Islamist parties.‎

According to Egyptian Tourism Federation head Elhamy El-‎Zayat, an Islamist-dominated parliament would put some LE200 ‎billion ($33.3 billion) worth of tourism investments in jeopardy.‎

‎“I’ve had several debates with Islamist figures about tourism and ‎I fear the sector will collapse under their rule,” he told Ahram ‎Online in a telephone interview.‎

El-Zayat went on to point to recent statements by a Salafist ‎representative in which he said that the movement did not want ‎foreign tourists visiting Egypt.‎

‎“They’re only thinking about alcohol and bikinis, not the huge ‎amounts of revenue the sector brings Egypt’s economy,” El-‎Zayat stressed. “They want to rely on ‘cultural tourism,’ which ‎currently accounts for only 11 per cent of total tourism revenue.”‎

Tourism has traditionally represented one of Egypt’s top foreign ‎currency earners.‎


Catitan Sut:

Nampaknya sambutan masyarakat Masir terhadap kelompok politik Islam, semada Ikhwan mahupun Parti an-Nour, dari golongan salafi telah menjadikan mereka dua parti yang paling mendapat sokongan pada pusingan pertama pilihanraya Masir kali ini.

Kemenangan kelompok Islam ini telah menimbulkan kebimbangan di kalangan yang menentang mereka, mereka menimbulkan kemungkinan kesan kemenangan ini ke atas ekonomi Masir, walaupun mereka terpaksa menerima yang indeks di bursa saham Masir telah melonjak mengatasi tahap tinggi melebihi 4'000 mata (pada 30hb Nov 2011), saham-saham utama melonjak naik tanpa diganggu dengan berita kemenangan kelompok politik Islam. Mereka juga bimbang kesan kemenangan ini ke atas industri pelancongan yang meraih $3.3 billion US/ setahun, mereka membangkitkan ugutan kumpulan Parti an-Nour yang ada mengatakan yang mereka akan menghapuslan minuman alkohol dan pemakaian bikini di Masir, serta tidak berminat dengan pelancong dari barat.

Walaupun selama ini Masir sendiri tidak pernah mendakwa ianya adalah sebuah negara yang kaya mahupun mewah. Kenapa golongan ini terlalu takut kepada kesan ekonomi, seakan-akan sekiranya kumpulan Islam berkuasa , maka mereka akan hilang segala kekayaan dan kemewahan mereka yang telah mereka nikmati selama ini?.

Kemenangan Ikhwan di Masir merupakan perkembangan yang logik seiring dengan kemenangan an-Nahda di Tunisia dan PJD di Morokko. Seakan-akan ianya kesan domino politik, yang pernah suatu masa dahulu dikaitkan dengan perkembangan kominisme di rantau Asia Tenggara (walaupun ianya tidak pun terjadi).

Yang menariknya juga parti yang menang di Morokko adalah PJD (Justice and Development Party). di Masir pula FJP ( Freedom and Justice Party), sebelum ini di Turkey yang telah menjadi inspirasi bagi negara lain yang menangnya adalah AK Party (Justice and Development Party), Nampaknya musim politik sekarang menunjukkan parti yang berjenamakan 'keadilan' yang menang, parti yang berjenama 'nasional' , seumpama di Masir Hizbu al-Watani (National party) terperosok dan tertinggal.

Ikhwan pula agaknya di posisi tengah (wasatiyyah) antara 'liberalnya' kumpulan reformis yang berinspirasikan barat dan kekejangan kumpulan salafi yang sepatutnya literalist. Perkembangan ini tentunya mempunyai kesan ke seluruh dunia Islam, termasuk ke negara kita, hanyalah masa yang akan menentukan, dan local flavour yang memberi citarasa yang sedikit berbeza. Antaranya golongan salafi yang bertindak sebagai suatu blok khusus yang esklusif dalam politik di negara kita hanyalah ada pada UMNO dengan kumpulan Ulama Mudanya!